Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	156.44	156.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	1.4823	1.4823	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	-416.87	-416.87	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	-492.93	-492.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	-68.764	-68.764	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	-558.58	-558.58	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	-448.65	-448.65	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	-634.88	-634.88	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	-402.96	-402.96	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	-539.4	-539.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	-50.327	-50.327	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	-460.56	-460.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	-226.34	-226.34	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	-326.62	-326.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	-361.11	-361.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	-405.49	-405.49	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	201.9	201.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	-396.7	-396.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	-411.36	-411.36	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	-414.99	-414.99	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DJ	201.79	201.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DK	-416.87	-416.87	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DM	-595.09	-595.09	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DO	-421.93	-421.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DZ	14.068	14.068	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EC	-170.53	-170.53	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EE	-416.76	-416.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EG	110.1	110.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ER	195.4	195.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES	-287.97	-287.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	-135.06	-135.06	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	144.64	144.64	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	1.9837	1.9837	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	-638.76	-638.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	-416.87	-416.87	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	0.034636	0.034636	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	-406.59	-406.59	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	-637.82	-637.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GB	-359.33	-359.33	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GD	-564.93	-564.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GE	-226.9	-226.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	-536.24	-536.24	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	-416.87	-416.87	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	-491.09	-491.09	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	-396.7	-396.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	468.93	468.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	-396.7	-396.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	-440.77	-440.77	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest, natural Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	-610.12	-610.12	—	1.0000× identical	sole