Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BF	-386.26	-386.26	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BG	-687.38	-687.38	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BH	305.98	305.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BI	-341.22	-341.22	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BJ	-669.59	-669.59	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BL	-611.81	-611.81	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BN	-1,644.3	-1,644.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	-762.64	-762.64	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	177.63	177.63	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	-865.62	-865.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	-979.93	-979.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	-552.66	-552.66	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	-1,023	-1,023	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	-168.44	-168.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	-617.91	-617.91	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	-1,040.8	-1,040.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	-267.17	-267.17	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	-919.76	-919.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	-820.88	-820.88	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	-1,041	-1,041	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	-1,182.7	-1,182.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	-894.99	-894.99	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	-657.5	-657.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	-1,028.9	-1,028.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	-682.58	-682.58	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	-1,741.6	-1,741.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	-2,051.5	-2,051.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	-673.97	-673.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	23.393	23.393	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	-659.74	-659.74	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	-863.8	-863.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	-671.68	-671.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DJ	39.926	39.926	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DK	-606.24	-606.24	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DM	-1,940.4	-1,940.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DO	-1,074.3	-1,074.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DZ	-358.82	-358.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EC	-1,547.5	-1,547.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EE	-603.04	-603.04	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EG	-250.49	-250.49	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ER	-41.502	-41.502	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES	-558.38	-558.38	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	-547.3	-547.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	-208.55	-208.55	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	-197.11	-197.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	-2,146.7	-2,146.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	-586.91	-586.91	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	-641.88	-641.88	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	-870.31	-870.31	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture, mosaic Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	-1,303	-1,303	—	1.0000× identical	sole