Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DJ	-3,808.7	-3,808.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DK	-7,971.2	-7,971.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DM	-9,851	-9,851	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DO	-9,147	-9,147	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DZ	-4,841.3	-4,841.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EC	-11,536	-11,536	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EE	-7,437.8	-7,437.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EG	-4,178.1	-4,178.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ER	-5,501	-5,501	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES	-8,225.4	-8,225.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	-6,995.5	-6,995.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	-6,114.4	-6,114.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	-7,691.4	-7,691.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	-8,782	-8,782	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	-7,750	-7,750	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	-10,786	-10,786	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	-11,025	-11,025	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	-9,859.2	-9,859.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GB	-11,764	-11,764	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GD	-9,856.1	-9,856.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GE	-10,972	-10,972	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	-8,793.1	-8,793.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	-10,520	-10,520	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	-7,164.6	-7,164.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	-7,336.7	-7,336.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	-3,742.7	-3,742.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	-3,814.6	-3,814.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	-9,787.5	-9,787.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	-8,205.9	-8,205.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	-9,852	-9,852	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GR	-9,546.8	-9,546.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GT	-9,637.8	-9,637.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GW	-8,754.9	-8,754.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GY	-9,858.2	-9,858.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HN	-12,030	-12,030	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HR	-12,087	-12,087	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HT	-10,280	-10,280	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HU	-6,458.9	-6,458.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ID	-9,845.4	-9,845.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IE	-12,555	-12,555	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IL	-4,896.6	-4,896.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IM	-11,954	-11,954	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IN	-7,632.7	-7,632.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IQ	-1,797.1	-1,797.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IR	-5,245.6	-5,245.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IS	-10,501	-10,501	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IT	-10,331	-10,331	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JE	-10,827	-10,827	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JM	-9,860.1	-9,860.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	-4,278.6	-4,278.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole