Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DJ	100.93	100.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DK	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DM	-695.94	-695.94	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DO	-522.79	-522.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DZ	-86.789	-86.789	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EC	-271.39	-271.39	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EE	-517.62	-517.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EG	9.2461	9.2461	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ER	94.542	94.542	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES	-388.83	-388.83	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	-235.92	-235.92	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	43.782	43.782	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	-98.873	-98.873	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	-739.62	-739.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	-100.82	-100.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	-507.44	-507.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	-738.68	-738.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GB	-460.19	-460.19	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GD	-665.79	-665.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GE	-327.76	-327.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	-637.1	-637.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	-591.95	-591.95	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	468.93	468.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	-541.62	-541.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	-618.59	-618.59	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	-710.98	-710.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GR	-420.58	-420.58	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GT	-439.11	-439.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GW	-552.77	-552.77	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GY	-623.33	-623.33	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HN	-543.76	-543.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HR	-499.94	-499.94	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HT	-572.07	-572.07	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HU	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ID	-567.73	-567.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IE	-517.2	-517.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IL	-47.009	-47.009	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IM	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IN	-231.97	-231.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IQ	22.249	22.249	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IR	15.689	15.689	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IS	73.89	73.89	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IT	-431.98	-431.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JE	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JM	-700.57	-700.57	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	30.373	30.373	—	1.0000× identical	sole