Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DJ	-1,202.2	-1,202.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DK	-4,560	-4,560	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DM	-10,470	-10,470	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DO	-9,353.6	-9,353.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DZ	-4,840.1	-4,840.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EC	-8,933.3	-8,933.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EE	-4,509.6	-4,509.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EG	-4,688	-4,688	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ER	-2,373.7	-2,373.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES	-5,069.3	-5,069.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	-7,485.7	-7,485.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	-3,819.8	-3,819.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	-3,194.1	-3,194.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	-10,187	-10,187	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	-4,850.7	-4,850.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	-7,752.1	-7,752.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	-8,707.3	-8,707.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	-8,892.3	-8,892.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GB	-5,188.8	-5,188.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GD	-9,784.1	-9,784.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GE	-4,878.1	-4,878.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	-9,609	-9,609	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	-5,138.6	-5,138.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	-5,939.5	-5,939.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	-5,628.2	-5,628.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	-5.5553	-5.5553	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	-3,809.9	-3,809.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	-9,409	-9,409	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	-7,355.4	-7,355.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	-10,181	-10,181	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GR	-6,093.7	-6,093.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GT	-9,378.4	-9,378.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GW	-6,017.1	-6,017.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GY	-9,043.3	-9,043.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HN	-9,965.3	-9,965.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HR	-9,169.9	-9,169.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HT	-9,683.6	-9,683.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HU	-4,465	-4,465	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ID	-10,559	-10,559	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IE	-8,930.2	-8,930.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IL	-1,702.9	-1,702.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IM	-5,278	-5,278	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IN	-5,468	-5,468	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IQ	-976.06	-976.06	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IR	-2,395.3	-2,395.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IS	-6,252.8	-6,252.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IT	-6,640.4	-6,640.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JE	-8,536.7	-8,536.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JM	-8,751.8	-8,751.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	-1,330.1	-1,330.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole