Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SK	11,002	11,002	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SL	9,854.9	9,854.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SM	9,025.6	9,025.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SN	7,054.3	7,054.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SO	4,849.5	4,849.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SR	9,860.9	9,860.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SS	3,742.5	3,742.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ST	12,296	12,296	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SV	12,052	12,052	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SX	7,337.4	7,337.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SY	2,869.2	2,869.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SZ	7,800	7,800	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TC	5,157.9	5,157.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TD	5,802.9	5,802.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TG	7,377.4	7,377.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TH	9,794.3	9,794.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TJ	9,006	9,006	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TL	11,427	11,427	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TM	4,277.7	4,277.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TN	5,536	5,536	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TR	7,332.7	7,332.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TT	8,796.9	8,796.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TZ	4,947.8	4,947.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UA	5,547.9	5,547.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UG	5,634.2	5,634.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	US	7,917.8	7,917.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UY	7,162.1	7,162.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UZ	4,335.2	4,335.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VA	7,763.3	7,763.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VC	12,309	12,309	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VE	9,558.3	9,558.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VG	7,537.8	7,537.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VI	7,545.1	7,545.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VN	11,930	11,930	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VU	8,772.8	8,772.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	YE	4,562.3	4,562.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	YT	8,602.4	8,602.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ZA	6,150.7	6,150.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ZM	6,798.3	6,798.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ZW	8,366.7	8,366.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From permanent cropland Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	-501.91	—	-501.91	1.0000× identical	agreed
To cropland, irrigated, intensive Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	509.46	—	509.46	1.0000× identical	agreed
Cropland, non-irrigated, extensive Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	—	46.211	—	46.211	1.0000× identical	agreed
From forest, intensive Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	-339.64	—	-339.64	1.0000× identical	agreed
Permanent cropland, irrigated, extensive Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	—	46.211	—	46.211	1.0000× identical	agreed
To dump site, inert material landfill Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	—	4,472.6	4,472.6	1.0000× identical	adopted
To cropland, non-irrigated, extensive Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	462.11	—	462.11	1.0000× identical	agreed