Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BL	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BN	-739.62	-739.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	-327.16	-327.16	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	100.89	100.89	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	-600.36	-600.36	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	-530.66	-530.66	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	55.58	55.58	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	-99.374	-99.374	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	-593.78	-593.78	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	-169.62	-169.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	-659.44	-659.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	-549.51	-549.51	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	-735.74	-735.74	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	-503.82	-503.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	-640.26	-640.26	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	-151.18	-151.18	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	-561.41	-561.41	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	-327.2	-327.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	-427.47	-427.47	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	-461.97	-461.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	-506.35	-506.35	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	101.05	101.05	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	-512.22	-512.22	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	-515.84	-515.84	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DJ	100.93	100.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DK	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DM	-695.94	-695.94	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DO	-522.79	-522.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DZ	-86.789	-86.789	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EC	-271.39	-271.39	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EE	-517.62	-517.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EG	9.2461	9.2461	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ER	94.542	94.542	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES	-388.83	-388.83	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	-235.92	-235.92	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	43.782	43.782	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	-98.873	-98.873	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	-739.62	-739.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	-100.82	-100.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	-507.44	-507.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	-738.68	-738.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GB	-460.19	-460.19	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GD	-665.79	-665.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GE	-327.76	-327.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	-637.1	-637.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole