Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	-591.95	-591.95	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	468.93	468.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	-541.62	-541.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	-618.59	-618.59	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	-710.98	-710.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GR	-420.58	-420.58	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GT	-439.11	-439.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GW	-552.77	-552.77	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GY	-623.33	-623.33	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HN	-543.76	-543.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HR	-499.94	-499.94	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HT	-572.07	-572.07	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HU	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ID	-567.73	-567.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IE	-517.2	-517.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IL	-47.009	-47.009	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IM	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IN	-231.97	-231.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IQ	22.249	22.249	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IR	15.689	15.689	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IS	73.89	73.89	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IT	-431.98	-431.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JE	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JM	-700.57	-700.57	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	30.373	30.373	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	-375.55	-375.55	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	16.794	16.794	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	-523.93	-523.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	-573.71	-573.71	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	-514.82	-514.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	370.04	370.04	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	-43.981	-43.981	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	-357.23	-357.23	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	-302.13	-302.13	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	-634.95	-634.95	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	-497.71	-497.71	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	-574.14	-574.14	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	-737.54	-737.54	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	19.049	19.049	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	-517.39	-517.39	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	0.47417	0.47417	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	-141.87	-141.87	—	1.0000× identical	sole