Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	-398.79	-398.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	-487.68	-487.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	-213.17	-213.17	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	-474.09	-474.09	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	-100.81	-100.81	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	-348	-348	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	-226.11	-226.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	-691.2	-691.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	100.86	100.86	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	-567.06	-567.06	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	-418.84	-418.84	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	-169.06	-169.06	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	-644.22	-644.22	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	-503.91	-503.91	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	-75.969	-75.969	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	-739.62	-739.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	87.087	87.087	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	-429.8	-429.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	-620.96	-620.96	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	87.661	87.661	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	-70.547	-70.547	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	-505	-505	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	30.204	30.204	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	-590.46	-590.46	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PE	-233.52	-233.52	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PG	-487.14	-487.14	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PH	-550.09	-550.09	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PK	-30.305	-30.305	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PL	-516.88	-516.88	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PM	-100.83	-100.83	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PR	-713.89	-713.89	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PS	-114.19	-114.19	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PT	-401.47	-401.47	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PY	-510.47	-510.47	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	QA	350.95	350.95	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RO	-436.77	-436.77	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RS	-516.38	-516.38	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RU	-96.473	-96.473	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RW	87.354	87.354	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SA	28.991	28.991	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SB	-739.62	-739.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SD	33.721	33.721	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SE	-195.68	-195.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SG	-739.62	-739.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SI	-508.05	-508.05	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SK	-511.04	-511.04	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SL	-627	-627	—	1.0000× identical	sole