Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	-8,434.1	-8,434.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	-2,221.2	-2,221.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	-6,122.5	-6,122.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	-6,590.6	-6,590.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	-10,159	-10,159	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	-4,169	-4,169	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	-9,631.1	-9,631.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	-8,212.6	-8,212.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	-2,245.5	-2,245.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	-4,219.3	-4,219.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	-1,592.2	-1,592.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	-9,106.8	-9,106.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	-6,711.7	-6,711.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	-8,538.9	-8,538.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	-10,108	-10,108	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	-7,273.5	-7,273.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	-8,062.4	-8,062.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	-3,761.9	-3,761.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	-6,549.5	-6,549.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	-7,438.1	-7,438.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	-5,231.6	-5,231.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	-4,536.7	-4,536.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	-6,019.6	-6,019.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	-5,846.7	-5,846.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	-10,578	-10,578	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	-5,588.3	-5,588.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	-4,479.5	-4,479.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	-8,648.1	-8,648.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	-3,560.5	-3,560.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	-9,311.2	-9,311.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	-2,493.9	-2,493.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	-8,108.5	-8,108.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	-4,833.2	-4,833.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	-6,515.5	-6,515.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	-7,011.9	-7,011.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	-4,631.3	-4,631.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	-6,325.5	-6,325.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	-9,328.6	-9,328.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	-6,352.4	-6,352.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	-5,589.8	-5,589.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	-8,446.5	-8,446.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	-5,024.4	-5,024.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	-6,489.5	-6,489.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	-8,103.1	-8,103.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	-5,132	-5,132	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	-6,700.3	-6,700.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	-8,155.9	-8,155.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	-11,104	-11,104	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	-2,330.8	-2,330.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	-9,170.7	-9,170.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole