Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	-11,785	-11,785	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	-2,645.4	-2,645.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	-8,156.4	-8,156.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	-8,630.9	-8,630.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	-12,445	-12,445	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	-4,087.8	-4,087.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	-11,625	-11,625	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	-12,119	-12,119	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	-4,056	-4,056	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	-4,879.2	-4,879.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	-2,162.9	-2,162.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	-11,890	-11,890	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	-10,558	-10,558	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	-12,201	-12,201	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	-12,451	-12,451	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	-9,857.8	-9,857.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	-8,792.7	-8,792.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	-5,401.7	-5,401.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	-9,837.1	-9,837.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	-11,916	-11,916	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	-7,600.3	-7,600.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	-4,505.5	-4,505.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	-6,045.3	-6,045.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	-8,073	-8,073	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	-12,448	-12,448	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	-7,337.4	-7,337.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	-6,496	-6,496	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	-9,823.2	-9,823.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	-5,314.4	-5,314.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	-11,853	-11,853	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	-3,103.7	-3,103.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	-9,857.1	-9,857.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	-4,735.3	-4,735.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	-8,550.3	-8,550.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	-10,783	-10,783	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	-5,870.2	-5,870.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	-7,243	-7,243	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	-9,845	-9,845	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	-8,679.6	-8,679.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	-5,660.5	-5,660.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	-12,313	-12,313	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	-4,860	-4,860	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	-9,752.2	-9,752.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	-9,859.2	-9,859.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	-7,857.8	-7,857.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	-9,803.9	-9,803.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	-11,115	-11,115	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	-12,481	-12,481	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	-4,023.4	-4,023.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	-9,848.7	-9,848.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole