Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	-6,082.3	-6,082.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	-1,951.6	-1,951.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	-9,026.8	-9,026.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	-6,972.4	-6,972.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	-13,253	-13,253	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	-6,752.5	-6,752.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	-9,121.4	-9,121.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	-6,279.5	-6,279.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	-982.51	-982.51	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	-4,510.4	-4,510.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	-1,166.3	-1,166.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	-9,954.6	-9,954.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	-5,834.8	-5,834.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	-10,269	-10,269	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	-13,116	-13,116	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	-9,574.3	-9,574.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	-9,767.4	-9,767.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	-2,618.3	-2,618.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	-5,051.1	-5,051.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	-5,640	-5,640	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	-4,526	-4,526	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	-4,563.2	-4,563.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	-6,129.9	-6,129.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	-4,487.8	-4,487.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	-9,926.8	-9,926.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	-5,305.9	-5,305.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	-7,336.7	-7,336.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	-8,506.3	-8,506.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	-2,348	-2,348	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	-9,948.7	-9,948.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	-2,069.7	-2,069.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	-10,129	-10,129	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	-4,866.9	-4,866.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	-9,429.3	-9,429.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	-5,300	-5,300	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	-5,319.5	-5,319.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	-6,345.4	-6,345.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	-11,015	-11,015	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	-5,861.2	-5,861.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	-5,685.5	-5,685.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	-10,236	-10,236	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	-5,076.7	-5,076.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	-5,846.2	-5,846.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	-9,037.5	-9,037.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	-4,511.9	-4,511.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	-5,951	-5,951	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	-10,958	-10,958	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	-13,503	-13,503	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	-1,091.1	-1,091.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	-10,543	-10,543	—	1.0000× identical	sole