Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	547.3	547.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	208.55	208.55	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	197.11	197.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	2,146.7	2,146.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	586.91	586.91	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	641.88	641.88	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	870.31	870.31	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	1,303	1,303	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GB	652.02	652.02	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GD	1,475.6	1,475.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GE	588.76	588.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	1,371.2	1,371.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	647.72	647.72	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	794.41	794.41	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	598.2	598.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	-451.07	-451.07	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	480.24	480.24	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	1,220.7	1,220.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	1,059.3	1,059.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	1,811.4	1,811.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GR	708.61	708.61	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GT	1,621	1,621	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GW	828.96	828.96	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GY	1,211.2	1,211.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HN	1,668.6	1,668.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HR	965.09	965.09	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HT	1,478.7	1,478.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HU	585.9	585.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ID	2,006.4	2,006.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IE	929.48	929.48	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IL	137.99	137.99	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IM	678.23	678.23	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IN	654.64	654.64	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IQ	14.857	14.857	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IR	69.384	69.384	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IS	316.82	316.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IT	788.11	788.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JE	846.17	846.17	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JM	1,292.6	1,292.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	41.971	41.971	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	802.28	802.28	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	1.1985	1.1985	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	1,063.4	1,063.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	948.91	948.91	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	1,963.8	1,963.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	829.32	829.32	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	957.23	957.23	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	853.92	853.92	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	-318.41	-318.41	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	536.94	536.94	—	1.0000× identical	sole