Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ZW	763.06	763.06	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	-5,911.8	-5,911.8	-5,911.8	1.0000× identical	agreed
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AD	-12,408	-12,408	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AE	-2,310.9	-2,310.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AF	-5,901.9	-5,901.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AG	-4,421.8	-4,421.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AI	-5,580.8	-5,580.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AL	-9,983	-9,983	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AM	-4,751.8	-4,751.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AO	-6,987.2	-6,987.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AR	-6,978	-6,978	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AT	-12,427	-12,427	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AU	-3,347.4	-3,347.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AW	-1,079.8	-1,079.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AZ	-4,238.3	-4,238.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BA	-11,787	-11,787	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BB	-5,567.1	-5,567.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BD	-8,662.8	-8,662.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BE	-11,184	-11,184	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BF	-4,459.2	-4,459.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BG	-7,242.1	-7,242.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BH	-2,242.7	-2,242.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BI	-3,239.7	-3,239.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BJ	-6,148.4	-6,148.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BL	-5,579.6	-5,579.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BN	-9,248.6	-9,248.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	-6,242.2	-6,242.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	-1,080.3	-1,080.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	-5,575	-5,575	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	-9,254.9	-9,254.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	-4,290.6	-4,290.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	-8,397.1	-8,397.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	-4,199.5	-4,199.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	-7,628.2	-7,628.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	-8,661.6	-8,661.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	-4,393.2	-4,393.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	-7,067.4	-7,067.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	-7,552.2	-7,552.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	-9,413.9	-9,413.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	-12,437	-12,437	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	-6,885.7	-6,885.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	-9,975.9	-9,975.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	-8,717.8	-8,717.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	-7,928.6	-7,928.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	-9,066.2	-9,066.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	-9,208.7	-9,208.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	-5,768.8	-5,768.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	-2,450	-2,450	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	-7,131.5	-7,131.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	-9,890.6	-9,890.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole