Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	-2,528.7	-2,528.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	-10,028	-10,028	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	-1,981.1	-1,981.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	-6,337.7	-6,337.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	-8,439.6	-8,439.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	-12,090	-12,090	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	-3,966.3	-3,966.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	-11,136	-11,136	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	-10,362	-10,362	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	-2,291.4	-2,291.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	-4,214.7	-4,214.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	-1,511.6	-1,511.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	-10,132	-10,132	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	-8,333.7	-8,333.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	-9,982.2	-9,982.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	-12,391	-12,391	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	-9,245.4	-9,245.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	-8,657.9	-8,657.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	-3,670.4	-3,670.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	-7,868	-7,868	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	-9,654.6	-9,654.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	-6,700	-6,700	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	-4,460.6	-4,460.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	-5,993.9	-5,993.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	-6,228.9	-6,228.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	-12,390	-12,390	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	-5,579.9	-5,579.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	-5,522.3	-5,522.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	-9,529.1	-9,529.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	-3,557.7	-3,557.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	-10,094	-10,094	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	-2,449.5	-2,449.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	-9,248.5	-9,248.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	-4,699.7	-4,699.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	-7,534.2	-7,534.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	-8,652.8	-8,652.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	-5,096.9	-5,096.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	-6,994.7	-6,994.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	-9,235	-9,235	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	-6,815	-6,815	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	-5,601.1	-5,601.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	-10,600	-10,600	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	-4,833.5	-4,833.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	-7,714.1	-7,714.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	-9,251.1	-9,251.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	-6,907.1	-6,907.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	-9,188.2	-9,188.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	-10,762	-10,762	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	-12,420	-12,420	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	-2,276.7	-2,276.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole