Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	-9,239.1	-9,239.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PE	-11,010	-11,010	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PG	-9,230.4	-9,230.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PH	-10,596	-10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PK	-4,682.5	-4,682.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PL	-7,525.6	-7,525.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PM	-8,603.5	-8,603.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PR	-7,199.3	-7,199.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PS	-4,910.1	-4,910.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PT	-10,005	-10,005	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PY	-4,993.5	-4,993.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	QA	-2,231.3	-2,231.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RO	-6,958.3	-6,958.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RS	-9,827.3	-9,827.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RU	-4,787.7	-4,787.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RW	-4,144.8	-4,144.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SA	-4,366.4	-4,366.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SB	-10,596	-10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SD	-5,230.6	-5,230.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SE	-6,770.7	-6,770.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SG	-9,255.2	-9,255.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SI	-12,458	-12,458	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SK	-10,591	-10,591	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SL	-9,246.1	-9,246.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SM	-7,108.7	-7,108.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SN	-5,250.9	-5,250.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SO	-3,099.4	-3,099.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SR	-9,253	-9,253	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SS	-3,591.6	-3,591.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ST	-10,596	-10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SV	-10,293	-10,293	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SX	-5,579.9	-5,579.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SY	-2,230.6	-2,230.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SZ	-5,988.6	-5,988.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TC	-4,550.8	-4,550.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TD	-5,756.2	-5,756.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TG	-6,490.4	-6,490.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TH	-9,129	-9,129	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TJ	-7,064	-7,064	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TL	-9,669.2	-9,669.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TM	-2,531.4	-2,531.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TN	-5,508.3	-5,508.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TR	-5,343.4	-5,343.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TT	-8,662.7	-8,662.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TZ	-4,214.9	-4,214.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UA	-4,759.8	-4,759.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UG	-4,958.6	-4,958.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	US	-7,654	-7,654	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UY	-6,657.8	-6,657.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UZ	-2,672.2	-2,672.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole