Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	6,242.2	6,242.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	1,080.3	1,080.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	5,575	5,575	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	9,254.9	9,254.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	4,290.6	4,290.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	8,397.1	8,397.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	4,199.5	4,199.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	7,628.2	7,628.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	8,661.6	8,661.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	4,393.2	4,393.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	7,067.4	7,067.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	7,552.2	7,552.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	9,413.9	9,413.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	12,437	12,437	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	6,885.7	6,885.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	9,975.9	9,975.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	8,717.8	8,717.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	7,928.6	7,928.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	9,066.2	9,066.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	9,208.7	9,208.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	5,768.8	5,768.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	2,450	2,450	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	7,131.5	7,131.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	9,890.6	9,890.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	8,280.3	8,280.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DJ	2,117.3	2,117.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DK	7,007.2	7,007.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DM	9,241.5	9,241.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DO	7,226.2	7,226.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DZ	4,788.8	4,788.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EC	9,778.9	9,778.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EE	6,555.1	6,555.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EG	4,195	4,195	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ER	3,674.6	3,674.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES	6,352.3	6,352.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	6,953	6,953	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	4,257.6	4,257.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	5,747.3	5,747.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	8,645.6	8,645.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	6,009	6,009	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	10,728	10,728	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	10,623	10,623	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	9,251	9,251	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GB	9,490.8	9,490.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GD	8,858.3	8,858.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GE	8,697.5	8,697.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	8,658.4	8,658.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	8,440.8	8,440.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	6,363.3	6,363.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	5,579.1	5,579.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole