Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	2,519.3	2,519.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	3,623.8	3,623.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	9,121.9	9,121.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	7,614.3	7,614.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	9,242.8	9,242.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GR	7,519.3	7,519.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GT	8,971	8,971	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GW	8,563.8	8,563.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GY	9,249.9	9,249.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HN	9,757.7	9,757.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HR	11,529	11,529	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HT	8,278.3	8,278.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HU	5,682.4	5,682.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ID	9,235.7	9,235.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IE	12,464	12,464	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IL	3,108.8	3,108.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IM	9,700.4	9,700.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IN	6,479.6	6,479.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IQ	1,163.9	1,163.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IR	3,493.9	3,493.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IS	10,444	10,444	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IT	8,207.4	8,207.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JE	10,463	10,463	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JM	8,815.6	8,815.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	2,528.7	2,528.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	10,028	10,028	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	1,981.1	1,981.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	6,337.7	6,337.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	8,439.6	8,439.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	12,090	12,090	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	3,966.3	3,966.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	11,136	11,136	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	10,362	10,362	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	2,291.4	2,291.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	4,214.7	4,214.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	1,511.6	1,511.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	10,132	10,132	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	8,333.7	8,333.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	9,982.2	9,982.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	12,391	12,391	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	9,245.4	9,245.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	8,657.9	8,657.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	3,670.4	3,670.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	7,868	7,868	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	9,654.6	9,654.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	6,700	6,700	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	4,460.6	4,460.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	5,993.9	5,993.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	6,228.9	6,228.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	12,390	12,390	—	1.0000× identical	sole