Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	5,579.9	5,579.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	5,522.3	5,522.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	9,529.1	9,529.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	3,557.7	3,557.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	10,094	10,094	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	2,449.5	2,449.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	9,248.5	9,248.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	4,699.7	4,699.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	7,534.2	7,534.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	8,652.8	8,652.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	5,096.9	5,096.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	6,994.7	6,994.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	9,235	9,235	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	6,815	6,815	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	5,601.1	5,601.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	10,600	10,600	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	4,833.5	4,833.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	7,714.1	7,714.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	9,251.1	9,251.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	6,907.1	6,907.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	9,188.2	9,188.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	10,762	10,762	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	12,420	12,420	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	2,276.7	2,276.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	9,239.1	9,239.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PE	11,010	11,010	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PG	9,230.4	9,230.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PH	10,596	10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PK	4,682.5	4,682.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PL	7,525.6	7,525.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PM	8,603.5	8,603.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PR	7,199.3	7,199.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PS	4,910.1	4,910.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PT	10,005	10,005	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PY	4,993.5	4,993.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	QA	2,231.3	2,231.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RO	6,958.3	6,958.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RS	9,827.3	9,827.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RU	4,787.7	4,787.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RW	4,144.8	4,144.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SA	4,366.4	4,366.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SB	10,596	10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SD	5,230.6	5,230.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SE	6,770.7	6,770.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SG	9,255.2	9,255.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SI	12,458	12,458	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SK	10,591	10,591	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SL	9,246.1	9,246.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SM	7,108.7	7,108.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SN	5,250.9	5,250.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole