Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	-7,021.9	-7,021.9	-7,021.9	1.0000× identical	agreed
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AD	-12,466	-12,466	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AE	-4,085.1	-4,085.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AF	-6,021.9	-6,021.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AG	-4,646.4	-4,646.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AI	-7,338.1	-7,338.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AL	-11,881	-11,881	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AM	-6,649.6	-6,649.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AO	-8,891.7	-8,891.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AR	-7,028	-7,028	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AT	-12,497	-12,497	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AU	-5,130.7	-5,130.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AW	-1,270.6	-1,270.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AZ	-6,042.8	-6,042.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BA	-12,380	-12,380	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BB	-5,983.5	-5,983.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BD	-8,798.2	-8,798.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BE	-11,661	-11,661	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BF	-5,181.8	-5,181.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BG	-9,170.7	-9,170.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BH	-3,992.3	-3,992.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BI	-3,993.8	-3,993.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BJ	-6,977.6	-6,977.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BL	-7,337.1	-7,337.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BN	-9,857.2	-9,857.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	-7,250.3	-7,250.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	-1,271	-1,271	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	-7,333.1	-7,333.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	-9,862.5	-9,862.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	-4,955	-4,955	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	-10,154	-10,154	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	-5,936.9	-5,936.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	-9,585.6	-9,585.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	-8,795.9	-8,795.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	-6,306.4	-6,306.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	-7,585	-7,585	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	-8,597	-8,597	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	-11,549	-11,549	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	-12,495	-12,495	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	-7,761.9	-7,761.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	-10,632	-10,632	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	-9,859.1	-9,859.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	-8,154.3	-8,154.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	-9,732.9	-9,732.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	-9,837.5	-9,837.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	-6,210.1	-6,210.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	-3,160.2	-3,160.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	-9,051.7	-9,051.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	-10,186	-10,186	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	-10,347	-10,347	—	1.0000× identical	sole