Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	-4,708.4	-4,708.4	-4,708.4	1.0000× identical	agreed
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AD	-12,337	-12,337	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AE	-948.15	-948.15	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AF	-5,934.5	-5,934.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AG	-4,587.7	-4,587.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AI	-4,803.6	-4,803.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AL	-6,127.8	-6,127.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AM	-2,750	-2,750	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AO	-6,128.5	-6,128.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AR	-7,373.6	-7,373.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AT	-10,511	-10,511	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AU	-1,952.6	-1,952.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AW	-1,140.3	-1,140.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AZ	-2,776.9	-2,776.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BA	-9,526.8	-9,526.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BB	-5,092.7	-5,092.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BD	-6,487	-6,487	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BE	-8,808.5	-8,808.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BF	-3,588.1	-3,588.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BG	-5,554.3	-5,554.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BH	-1,033.9	-1,033.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BI	-4,820.5	-4,820.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BJ	-5,186.7	-5,186.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BL	-5,559.7	-5,559.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BN	-10,435	-10,435	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	-6,800.8	-6,800.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	-1,044	-1,044	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	-7,860.3	-7,860.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	-7,014.4	-7,014.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	-4,441.5	-4,441.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	-6,704	-6,704	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	-3,072.2	-3,072.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	-4,982.7	-4,982.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	-7,537.6	-7,537.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	-2,115.4	-2,115.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	-6,156.4	-6,156.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	-6,297.6	-6,297.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	-6,898.9	-6,898.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	-11,038	-11,038	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	-6,369.5	-6,369.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	-7,485.3	-7,485.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	-8,083.4	-8,083.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	-7,288.5	-7,288.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	-10,059	-10,059	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	-10,665	-10,665	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	-5,140.1	-5,140.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	-2,008.2	-2,008.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	-5,369.2	-5,369.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	-8,745.2	-8,745.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	-5,316.8	-5,316.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole