Where the implementations differ
Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.
Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.
| Flow | Category | Place | European Commission — JRC | GreenDelta | ecoinvent Centre | Apart | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nickel(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 6.2500e-06 | 1.1893e-05 |
1.9×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Cadmium(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 9.2800e-07 | 1.7466e-06 |
1.88×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Chromium(6+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 5.2700e-05 | 9.9035e-05 |
1.88×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Arsenic, Ion
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 1.8600e-05 | 3.4101e-05 |
1.83×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
adopted |
|
Lead(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 8.5900e-09 | 1.4352e-08 |
1.67×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Mercury(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 1.2400e-05 | 1.5157e-05 |
1.22×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Beryllium(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 8.7200e-28 | 8.1861e-28 |
1.07×
2x
GreenDelta higher
|
restated |