Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Human toxicity, cancer EF 3.1	—	4.1784e-05	4.1784e-05	4.1800e-05	1.0004× within tolerance ecoinvent Centre higher	agreed
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Human toxicity, cancer_organics EF 3.1	—	4.1784e-05	4.1784e-05	4.1800e-05	1.0004× within tolerance ecoinvent Centre higher	agreed
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Human toxicity, non-cancer EF 3.1	—	8.0891e-06	8.0891e-06	8.0900e-06	1.0001× within tolerance ecoinvent Centre higher	agreed
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Human toxicity, non-cancer_organics EF 3.1	—	8.0891e-06	8.0891e-06	8.0900e-06	1.0001× within tolerance ecoinvent Centre higher	agreed
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Climate change EF 3.1	—	2,200	2,200	2,200	1.0000× identical	agreed
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Climate change-Fossil EF 3.1	—	2,200	2,200	2,200	1.0000× identical	agreed
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Ecotoxicity, freshwater EF 3.1	—	91.959	91.959	91.959	1.0000× identical	agreed
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Ecotoxicity, freshwater_organics EF 3.1	—	91.959	91.959	91.959	1.0000× identical	agreed
Carbon tetrachloride Environmental → Air → Unknown	Ozone depletion EF 3.1	—	0.72	0.72	0.72	1.0000× identical	agreed