Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	8,793.1	8,793.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	10,520	10,520	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	7,164.6	7,164.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	7,336.7	7,336.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	3,742.7	3,742.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	3,814.6	3,814.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	9,787.5	9,787.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	8,205.9	8,205.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	9,852	9,852	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GR	9,546.8	9,546.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GT	9,637.8	9,637.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GW	8,754.9	8,754.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GY	9,858.2	9,858.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HN	12,030	12,030	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HR	12,087	12,087	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HT	10,280	10,280	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HU	6,458.9	6,458.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ID	9,845.4	9,845.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IE	12,555	12,555	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IL	4,896.6	4,896.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IM	11,954	11,954	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IN	7,632.7	7,632.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IQ	1,797.1	1,797.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IR	5,245.6	5,245.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IS	10,501	10,501	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IT	10,331	10,331	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JE	10,827	10,827	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JM	9,860.1	9,860.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	4,278.6	4,278.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	11,785	11,785	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	2,645.4	2,645.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	8,156.4	8,156.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	8,630.9	8,630.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	12,445	12,445	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	4,087.8	4,087.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	11,625	11,625	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	12,119	12,119	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	4,056	4,056	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	4,879.2	4,879.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	2,162.9	2,162.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	11,890	11,890	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	10,558	10,558	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	12,201	12,201	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	12,451	12,451	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	9,857.8	9,857.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	8,792.7	8,792.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	5,401.7	5,401.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	9,837.1	9,837.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	11,916	11,916	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To urban, continuously built Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	7,600.3	7,600.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole