Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	10,028	10,028	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	1,981.1	1,981.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	6,337.7	6,337.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	8,439.6	8,439.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	12,090	12,090	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	3,966.3	3,966.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	11,136	11,136	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	10,362	10,362	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	2,291.4	2,291.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	4,214.7	4,214.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	1,511.6	1,511.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	10,132	10,132	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	8,333.7	8,333.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	9,982.2	9,982.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	12,391	12,391	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	9,245.4	9,245.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	8,657.9	8,657.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	3,670.4	3,670.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	7,868	7,868	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	9,654.6	9,654.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	6,700	6,700	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	4,460.6	4,460.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	5,993.9	5,993.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	6,228.9	6,228.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	12,390	12,390	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	5,579.9	5,579.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	5,522.3	5,522.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	9,529.1	9,529.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	3,557.7	3,557.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	10,094	10,094	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	2,449.5	2,449.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	9,248.5	9,248.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	4,699.7	4,699.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	7,534.2	7,534.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	8,652.8	8,652.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	5,096.9	5,096.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	6,994.7	6,994.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	9,235	9,235	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	6,815	6,815	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	5,601.1	5,601.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	10,600	10,600	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	4,833.5	4,833.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	7,714.1	7,714.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	9,251.1	9,251.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	6,907.1	6,907.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	9,188.2	9,188.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	10,762	10,762	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	12,420	12,420	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	2,276.7	2,276.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	9,239.1	9,239.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole