Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	375.55	375.55	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	-16.794	-16.794	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	497.56	497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	523.93	523.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	497.56	497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	573.71	573.71	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	517.73	517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	514.82	514.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	-370.04	-370.04	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	497.56	497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	43.981	43.981	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	357.23	357.23	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	302.13	302.13	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	634.95	634.95	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	497.71	497.71	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	574.14	574.14	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	737.54	737.54	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	-19.049	-19.049	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	517.73	517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	517.39	517.39	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	517.73	517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	-0.47417	-0.47417	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	141.87	141.87	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	398.79	398.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	487.68	487.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	497.56	497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	213.17	213.17	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	474.09	474.09	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	100.81	100.81	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	348	348	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	226.11	226.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	691.2	691.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	-100.86	-100.86	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	567.06	567.06	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	497.56	497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	418.84	418.84	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	169.06	169.06	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	644.22	644.22	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	503.91	503.91	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	75.969	75.969	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	739.62	739.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	-87.087	-87.087	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	429.8	429.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	620.96	620.96	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	517.73	517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	-87.661	-87.661	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	70.547	70.547	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	505	505	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	-30.204	-30.204	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	590.46	590.46	—	1.0000× identical	sole