Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PE	11,010	11,010	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PG	9,230.4	9,230.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PH	10,596	10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PK	4,682.5	4,682.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PL	7,525.6	7,525.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PM	8,603.5	8,603.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PR	7,199.3	7,199.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PS	4,910.1	4,910.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PT	10,005	10,005	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PY	4,993.5	4,993.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	QA	2,231.3	2,231.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RO	6,958.3	6,958.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RS	9,827.3	9,827.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RU	4,787.7	4,787.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RW	4,144.8	4,144.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SA	4,366.4	4,366.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SB	10,596	10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SD	5,230.6	5,230.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SE	6,770.7	6,770.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SG	9,255.2	9,255.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SI	12,458	12,458	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SK	10,591	10,591	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SL	9,246.1	9,246.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SM	7,108.7	7,108.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SN	5,250.9	5,250.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SO	3,099.4	3,099.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SR	9,253	9,253	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SS	3,591.6	3,591.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ST	10,596	10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SV	10,293	10,293	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SX	5,579.9	5,579.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SY	2,230.6	2,230.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SZ	5,988.6	5,988.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TC	4,550.8	4,550.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TD	5,756.2	5,756.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TG	6,490.4	6,490.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TH	9,129	9,129	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TJ	7,064	7,064	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TL	9,669.2	9,669.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TM	2,531.4	2,531.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TN	5,508.3	5,508.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TR	5,343.4	5,343.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TT	8,662.7	8,662.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TZ	4,214.9	4,214.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UA	4,759.8	4,759.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UG	4,958.6	4,958.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	US	7,654	7,654	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UY	6,657.8	6,657.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UZ	2,672.2	2,672.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VA	7,706	7,706	—	1.0000× identical	sole