Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	VC	229.18	229.18	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	VE	166.42	166.42	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	VG	136.76	136.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	VI	136.82	136.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	VN	204.83	204.83	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	VU	206.44	206.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	YE	113.75	113.75	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	YT	150.93	150.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	ZA	142.24	142.24	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	ZM	120.77	120.77	—	1.0000× identical	sole
Traffic area, rail and road embankment Land Use → Occupation	Land use EF 3.1	ZW	192.45	192.45	—	1.0000× identical	sole