Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	-214.63	-214.63	-214.63	1.0000× identical	agreed
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AD	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AE	381.27	381.27	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AF	29.06	29.06	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AG	-525.34	-525.34	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AI	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AL	-431.79	-431.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AM	26.941	26.941	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AO	-510.89	-510.89	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AR	-230.46	-230.46	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AT	-503.98	-503.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AU	-97.425	-97.425	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AW	100.96	100.96	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AZ	-362.34	-362.34	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BA	-504.64	-504.64	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BB	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BD	-576.04	-576.04	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BE	-517.02	-517.02	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BF	-334.36	-334.36	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BG	-510.62	-510.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BH	355.25	355.25	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BI	-14.677	-14.677	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BJ	-526.29	-526.29	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BL	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BN	-739.62	-739.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	-327.16	-327.16	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	100.89	100.89	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	-600.36	-600.36	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	-530.66	-530.66	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	55.58	55.58	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	-99.374	-99.374	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	-517.73	-517.73	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	-593.78	-593.78	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	-169.62	-169.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	-659.44	-659.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	-549.51	-549.51	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	-735.74	-735.74	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	-503.82	-503.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	-640.26	-640.26	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	-151.18	-151.18	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	-561.41	-561.41	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	-327.2	-327.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	-427.47	-427.47	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	-461.97	-461.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	-506.35	-506.35	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	101.05	101.05	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	-497.56	-497.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	-512.22	-512.22	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From forest Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	-515.84	-515.84	—	1.0000× identical	sole