Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	5,911.8	5,911.8	5,911.8	1.0000× identical	agreed
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AD	12,408	12,408	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AE	2,310.9	2,310.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AF	5,901.9	5,901.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AG	4,421.8	4,421.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AI	5,580.8	5,580.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AL	9,983	9,983	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AM	4,751.8	4,751.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AO	6,987.2	6,987.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AR	6,978	6,978	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AT	12,427	12,427	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AU	3,347.4	3,347.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AW	1,079.8	1,079.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AZ	4,238.3	4,238.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BA	11,787	11,787	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BB	5,567.1	5,567.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BD	8,662.8	8,662.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BE	11,184	11,184	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BF	4,459.2	4,459.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BG	7,242.1	7,242.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BH	2,242.7	2,242.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BI	3,239.7	3,239.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BJ	6,148.4	6,148.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BL	5,579.6	5,579.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BN	9,248.6	9,248.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	6,242.2	6,242.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	1,080.3	1,080.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	5,575	5,575	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	9,254.9	9,254.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	4,290.6	4,290.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	8,397.1	8,397.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	4,199.5	4,199.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	7,628.2	7,628.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	8,661.6	8,661.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	4,393.2	4,393.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	7,067.4	7,067.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	7,552.2	7,552.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	9,413.9	9,413.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	12,437	12,437	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	6,885.7	6,885.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	9,975.9	9,975.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	8,717.8	8,717.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	7,928.6	7,928.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	9,066.2	9,066.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	9,208.7	9,208.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	5,768.8	5,768.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	2,450	2,450	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	7,131.5	7,131.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	9,890.6	9,890.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To industrial area Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	8,280.3	8,280.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole