Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
Mercury(2+) Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Ecotoxicity, freshwater EF 3.1	—	16,073.774032	16,073.774032	16,073.774032	1.0000× within tolerance European Commission — JRC higher	agreed
Mercury(2+) Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Ecotoxicity, freshwater_inorganics EF 3.1	—	16,073.774032	16,073.774032	16,073.774032	1.0000× within tolerance European Commission — JRC higher	agreed
Mercury(2+) Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Human toxicity, cancer EF 3.1	—	0.0011	0.0011	0.0011	1.0000× identical	agreed
Mercury(2+) Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics EF 3.1	—	0.0011	0.0011	0.0011	1.0000× identical	agreed
Mercury(2+) Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Human toxicity, non-cancer EF 3.1	—	0.13017	0.13017	0.13017	1.0000× identical	agreed
Mercury(2+) Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Human toxicity, non-cancer_inorganics EF 3.1	—	0.13017	0.13017	0.13017	1.0000× identical	agreed