Where the implementations differ
Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.
Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.
| Flow | Category | Place | European Commission — JRC | GreenDelta | ecoinvent Centre | Apart | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nickel(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 6.2500e-06 | 1.1893e-05 |
1.9×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Nickel(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 6.2500e-06 | 1.1893e-05 |
1.9×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Nickel(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, non-cancer
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 3.5200e-07 | 6.6923e-07 |
1.9×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Nickel(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Human toxicity, non-cancer_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 3.5200e-07 | 6.6923e-07 |
1.9×
2x
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Nickel(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Ecotoxicity, freshwater
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 27,049.47608 | 27,049.476081 |
1.0000×
within tolerance
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |
|
Nickel(2+)
Environmental → Water → Unconfined aquifer
|
Ecotoxicity, freshwater_inorganics
EF 3.1
|
— | — | 27,049.47608 | 27,049.476081 |
1.0000×
within tolerance
ecoinvent Centre higher
|
restated |