Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Secondary Forest To Intensive Forest
2236f4fc7a5786a8664cf7b8e18f9f15e928afb0
Identity
- Substance
- fo-799a1564c1715ceb Unclassified
- Source
- stepwise algorithm addition
- Unit
- m2.a
- Context
- Land Use → Occupation
- CAS
- —
- EC
- —
Context
- Dimension
- Land Use
- Land use
- Occupation
Source lists
1| List | Version | Source flow | Name there | Why this flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stepwise | 2006-1.09 | e5d88e6b-141a-510c-8834-607e3375906a | Occupation, accelerated denaturalisation, secondary forest to intensive forest | Nothing in the list carried this substance, so this flow was created from this row. |
Concept associations
1| Source list | Source flow | Name there | Compartment there | Match | Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stepwise 2006-1.09 | e5d88e6b-141a-510c-8834-607e3375906a | Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Secondary Forest To Intensive Forest | Raw / (unspecified) | exactMatch | — |
Characterisation factors
2- consensus-flow-list 1
- 2.-0 LCA consultants 1
Every implementation that says anything about this flow. Published as is what this list did with the row: where more than one implementation states a number and they agree it publishes it as agreed; where only one speaks, as sole; where they disagree it publishes nothing and asks.
| Method | Implementation | Category | Place | Factor | Published as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stepwise 2006 | 2.-0 LCA consultants | Nature occupation | — | 0.1 | — |
| Stepwise 2006 | consensus-flow-list | Nature occupation | — | 0.1 | sole |
History
The change log and the PROV-O trail (0 consensus changes)
These are the heaviest sections of this page and the least often read, so the page does not pay for them until you ask.
Full record
Flow JSON
{
"uuid": "2236f4fc7a5786a8664cf7b8e18f9f15e928afb0",
"identifier": "",
"name": "Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Secondary Forest To Intensive Forest",
"source": "stepwise algorithm addition",
"cas_numbers": [],
"ec_numbers": [],
"context": {
"dimension": "Land Use",
"land_use": "Occupation"
},
"synonyms": [],
"lcia_methods": [],
"unit": "m2.a",
"input_datasets": [],
"prefLabel": [
{
"@value": "Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Secondary Forest To Intensive Forest",
"@language": "en",
"@lang": "en",
"provenance": {
"prov:wasGeneratedBy": "bootstrap_labels",
"prov:wasAttributedTo": "consensus-flow-list",
"prov:hadPrimarySource": [
"stepwise-2006-1.09"
],
"prov:wasDerivedFrom": "legacy name field"
}
}
],
"altLabel": [],
"context_iri": "https://vocab.brightway.one/flow-contexts/laus-occu",
"unit_iri": "https://vocab.brightway.one/units/unit/M2-YR",
"flow_object_id": "fo-799a1564c1715ceb",
"properties": {},
"references": [],
"concept_associations": [
{
"@type": "xkos:ConceptAssociation",
"xkos:sourceConcept": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.one/stepwise/2006-1.09/flow/e5d88e6b-141a-510c-8834-607e3375906a",
"skos:prefLabel": "Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Secondary Forest To Intensive Forest",
"context": "Raw / (unspecified)",
"qudt:hasUnit": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.one/units/unit/M2-YR"
},
"skos:exactMatch": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.dev/elementary-flows/2236f4fc7a5786a8664cf7b8e18f9f15e928afb0"
}
},
"xkos:targetConcept": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.dev/elementary-flows/2236f4fc7a5786a8664cf7b8e18f9f15e928afb0"
},
"provenance": {
"prov:wasGeneratedBy": "merge_stepwise",
"prov:wasAttributedTo": "consensus-flow-list",
"prov:hadPrimarySource": [
"stepwise:2006-1.09:e5d88e6b-141a-510c-8834-607e3375906a",
"Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Secondary Forest To Intensive Forest",
""
],
"prov:wasDerivedFrom": "flow_object_creation:no-flow-object-candidate"
}
}
],
"_sources": {},
"cas_match_labels": {},
"general_comment": "",
"_transformed": false,
"_provided": {
"name": null,
"synonyms": [],
"context": [],
"cas_numbers": [],
"ec_numbers": [],
"unit": null
},
"elementary_flow_id": "2236f4fc7a5786a8664cf7b8e18f9f15e928afb0"
}
Something wrong here?
A flow can be wrong in three ways, and they are decided differently. Pick the one that matches what you are looking at.
- A row from my list should not reach this flow
- This flow is not that chemical
- The compartment or the unit is wrong
- One of these characterisation factors cannot be this substance's
You do not need to run a build or clone anything. Name the row and say what your evidence is; the measurement is done for you. How contributing works