Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Primary Forest To Extensive Forest
41d6c1a92f04616b64e58fa4e45e3e243f6e3c4c
Identity
- Substance
- fo-23e133e248347baa Unclassified
- Source
- stepwise algorithm addition
- Unit
- m2.a
- Context
- Land Use → Occupation
- CAS
- —
- EC
- —
Context
- Dimension
- Land Use
- Land use
- Occupation
Source lists
1| List | Version | Source flow | Name there | Why this flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stepwise | 2006-1.09 | a7dccaef-836f-5143-b2fd-15833e740a34 | Occupation, accelerated denaturalisation, primary forest to extensive forest | Nothing in the list carried this substance, so this flow was created from this row. |
Concept associations
1| Source list | Source flow | Name there | Compartment there | Match | Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stepwise 2006-1.09 | a7dccaef-836f-5143-b2fd-15833e740a34 | Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Primary Forest To Extensive Forest | Raw / (unspecified) | exactMatch | — |
Characterisation factors
2- consensus-flow-list 1
- 2.-0 LCA consultants 1
Every implementation that says anything about this flow. Published as is what this list did with the row: where more than one implementation states a number and they agree it publishes it as agreed; where only one speaks, as sole; where they disagree it publishes nothing and asks.
| Method | Implementation | Category | Place | Factor | Published as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stepwise 2006 | 2.-0 LCA consultants | Nature occupation | — | 0.1 | — |
| Stepwise 2006 | consensus-flow-list | Nature occupation | — | 0.1 | sole |
History
The change log and the PROV-O trail (0 consensus changes)
These are the heaviest sections of this page and the least often read, so the page does not pay for them until you ask.
Full record
Flow JSON
{
"uuid": "41d6c1a92f04616b64e58fa4e45e3e243f6e3c4c",
"identifier": "",
"name": "Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Primary Forest To Extensive Forest",
"source": "stepwise algorithm addition",
"cas_numbers": [],
"ec_numbers": [],
"context": {
"dimension": "Land Use",
"land_use": "Occupation"
},
"synonyms": [],
"lcia_methods": [],
"unit": "m2.a",
"input_datasets": [],
"prefLabel": [
{
"@value": "Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Primary Forest To Extensive Forest",
"@language": "en",
"@lang": "en",
"provenance": {
"prov:wasGeneratedBy": "bootstrap_labels",
"prov:wasAttributedTo": "consensus-flow-list",
"prov:hadPrimarySource": [
"stepwise-2006-1.09"
],
"prov:wasDerivedFrom": "legacy name field"
}
}
],
"altLabel": [],
"context_iri": "https://vocab.brightway.one/flow-contexts/laus-occu",
"unit_iri": "https://vocab.brightway.one/units/unit/M2-YR",
"flow_object_id": "fo-23e133e248347baa",
"properties": {},
"references": [],
"concept_associations": [
{
"@type": "xkos:ConceptAssociation",
"xkos:sourceConcept": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.one/stepwise/2006-1.09/flow/a7dccaef-836f-5143-b2fd-15833e740a34",
"skos:prefLabel": "Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Primary Forest To Extensive Forest",
"context": "Raw / (unspecified)",
"qudt:hasUnit": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.one/units/unit/M2-YR"
},
"skos:exactMatch": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.dev/elementary-flows/41d6c1a92f04616b64e58fa4e45e3e243f6e3c4c"
}
},
"xkos:targetConcept": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.dev/elementary-flows/41d6c1a92f04616b64e58fa4e45e3e243f6e3c4c"
},
"provenance": {
"prov:wasGeneratedBy": "merge_stepwise",
"prov:wasAttributedTo": "consensus-flow-list",
"prov:hadPrimarySource": [
"stepwise:2006-1.09:a7dccaef-836f-5143-b2fd-15833e740a34",
"Occupation, Accelerated Denaturalisation, Primary Forest To Extensive Forest",
""
],
"prov:wasDerivedFrom": "flow_object_creation:no-flow-object-candidate"
}
}
],
"_sources": {},
"cas_match_labels": {},
"general_comment": "",
"_transformed": false,
"_provided": {
"name": null,
"synonyms": [],
"context": [],
"cas_numbers": [],
"ec_numbers": [],
"unit": null
},
"elementary_flow_id": "41d6c1a92f04616b64e58fa4e45e3e243f6e3c4c"
}
Something wrong here?
A flow can be wrong in three ways, and they are decided differently. Pick the one that matches what you are looking at.
- A row from my list should not reach this flow
- This flow is not that chemical
- The compartment or the unit is wrong
- One of these characterisation factors cannot be this substance's
You do not need to run a build or clone anything. Name the row and say what your evidence is; the measurement is done for you. How contributing works