Operating Surplus
8d178a94e5c67fce541d226d415d5c871031bdd9
Identity
- Substance
- fo-d121bc0e79c82e49 Unclassified
- Source
- stepwise algorithm addition
- Unit
- EUR
- Context
- Economic
- CAS
- —
- EC
- —
Context
- Dimension
- Economic
Source lists
1| List | Version | Source flow | Name there | Why this flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stepwise | 2006-1.09 | 44d609a7-6726-52be-a265-8629ac55b291 | Operating surplus | Nothing in the list carried this substance, so this flow was created from this row. |
Concept associations
1| Source list | Source flow | Name there | Compartment there | Match | Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stepwise 2006-1.09 | 44d609a7-6726-52be-a265-8629ac55b291 | Operating Surplus | Economic / (unspecified) | exactMatch | — |
Characterisation factors
2- consensus-flow-list 1
- 2.-0 LCA consultants 1
Every implementation that says anything about this flow. Published as is what this list did with the row: where more than one implementation states a number and they agree it publishes it as agreed; where only one speaks, as sole; where they disagree it publishes nothing and asks.
| Method | Implementation | Category | Place | Factor | Published as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stepwise 2006 | 2.-0 LCA consultants | Economic costs | — | 1 | — |
| Stepwise 2006 | consensus-flow-list | Economic costs | — | 1 | sole |
History
The change log and the PROV-O trail (0 consensus changes)
These are the heaviest sections of this page and the least often read, so the page does not pay for them until you ask.
Full record
Flow JSON
{
"uuid": "8d178a94e5c67fce541d226d415d5c871031bdd9",
"identifier": "",
"name": "Operating Surplus",
"source": "stepwise algorithm addition",
"cas_numbers": [],
"ec_numbers": [],
"context": {
"dimension": "Economic"
},
"synonyms": [],
"lcia_methods": [],
"unit": "EUR",
"input_datasets": [],
"prefLabel": [
{
"@value": "Operating Surplus",
"@language": "en",
"@lang": "en",
"provenance": {
"prov:wasGeneratedBy": "bootstrap_labels",
"prov:wasAttributedTo": "consensus-flow-list",
"prov:hadPrimarySource": [
"stepwise-2006-1.09"
],
"prov:wasDerivedFrom": "legacy name field"
}
}
],
"altLabel": [],
"context_iri": "https://vocab.brightway.one/flow-contexts/econ",
"unit_iri": "https://vocab.brightway.one/units/unit/EUR",
"flow_object_id": "fo-d121bc0e79c82e49",
"properties": {},
"references": [],
"concept_associations": [
{
"@type": "xkos:ConceptAssociation",
"xkos:sourceConcept": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.one/stepwise/2006-1.09/flow/44d609a7-6726-52be-a265-8629ac55b291",
"skos:prefLabel": "Operating Surplus",
"context": "Economic / (unspecified)",
"qudt:hasUnit": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.one/units/unit/EUR"
},
"skos:exactMatch": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.dev/elementary-flows/8d178a94e5c67fce541d226d415d5c871031bdd9"
}
},
"xkos:targetConcept": {
"@id": "https://vocab.brightway.dev/elementary-flows/8d178a94e5c67fce541d226d415d5c871031bdd9"
},
"provenance": {
"prov:wasGeneratedBy": "merge_stepwise",
"prov:wasAttributedTo": "consensus-flow-list",
"prov:hadPrimarySource": [
"stepwise:2006-1.09:44d609a7-6726-52be-a265-8629ac55b291",
"Operating Surplus",
""
],
"prov:wasDerivedFrom": "flow_object_creation:no-flow-object-candidate"
}
}
],
"_sources": {},
"cas_match_labels": {},
"general_comment": "",
"_transformed": false,
"_provided": {
"name": null,
"synonyms": [],
"context": [],
"cas_numbers": [],
"ec_numbers": [],
"unit": null
},
"elementary_flow_id": "8d178a94e5c67fce541d226d415d5c871031bdd9"
}
Something wrong here?
A flow can be wrong in three ways, and they are decided differently. Pick the one that matches what you are looking at.
- A row from my list should not reach this flow
- This flow is not that chemical
- The compartment or the unit is wrong
- One of these characterisation factors cannot be this substance's
You do not need to run a build or clone anything. Name the row and say what your evidence is; the measurement is done for you. How contributing works