Radioactive Species, Alpha Emitters
ac6fd525-e7b4-46fc-a613-5f2801c5c0ff
Deprecated
Replaced by 6ef4b2ee-8f56-4b68-bbee-dfe809dc33b0 .
Identity
- Substance
- fo-de2cec78fd769008 Atom grouping class
- Source
- EF 3.1
- Unit
- kBq
- Context
- Environmental → Water → Surface water
- CAS
- —
- EC
- —
Context
- Dimension
- Environmental
- Media
- Water
- Water body
- Surface water
Source lists
1| List | Version | Source flow | Name there | Why this flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EF | 3.1 | ac6fd525-e7b4-46fc-a613-5f2801c5c0ff | Radioactive species, alpha emitters | The consensus list is built from this one, so this row is the flow itself rather than something matched to it. |
History
The change log and the PROV-O trail (0 consensus changes)
These are the heaviest sections of this page and the least often read, so the page does not pay for them until you ask.
Full record
Flow JSON
{
"altLabel": [],
"properties": {
"isotope_lookup": {
"is_kbq_candidate": true,
"matched": false,
"matched_on": "",
"claimed_nuclide": "",
"resolved_nuclide": "",
"state_resolution": {},
"reason": "label_is_not_a_nuclide_name",
"source": "pubchem_pug_view_annotation_heading",
"sources": [
"pubchem_pug_view_annotation_heading"
]
}
},
"references": [],
"prefLabel": [
{
"@value": "Radioactive Species, Alpha Emitters",
"@language": "en",
"source": {
"prov:wasGeneratedBy": "bootstrap_labels",
"prov:wasAttributedTo": "consensus-flow-list",
"prov:hadPrimarySource": [
"EF 3.1"
],
"prov:wasDerivedFrom": "legacy name field"
}
}
],
"@type": [
"https://w3id.org/chemrof/AtomGroupingClass"
],
"uuid": "ac6fd525-e7b4-46fc-a613-5f2801c5c0ff",
"identifier": "ac6fd525-e7b4-46fc-a613-5f2801c5c0ff",
"source": "EF 3.1",
"cas_numbers": [],
"ec_numbers": [],
"context": {
"dimension": "Environmental",
"media": "Water",
"water_body": "Surface water"
},
"synonyms": [],
"lcia_methods": [],
"unit": "kBq",
"input_datasets": [
"EF 3.1"
],
"context_iri": "https://vocab.brightway.one/flow-contexts/envi-wate-suwa",
"unit_iri": "https://vocab.brightway.one/units/unit/KiloBQ",
"flow_object_id": "fo-de2cec78fd769008",
"concept_associations": [],
"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated": true,
"http://purl.org/dc/terms/isReplacedBy": "urn:uuid:6ef4b2ee-8f56-4b68-bbee-dfe809dc33b0",
"is_replaced_by_uuid": "6ef4b2ee-8f56-4b68-bbee-dfe809dc33b0",
"_sources": {
"prefLabel": "normalize_name_case",
"name": "bootstrap_labels",
"context": "default_context_mapping",
"context_iri": "default_context_mapping",
"unit_iri": "unit_normalization",
"owl_deprecated": "pipeline.deduplication",
"dcterms_is_replaced_by": "pipeline.deduplication",
"is_replaced_by_uuid": "pipeline.deduplication",
"types": "link_flows_to_their_substance",
"properties": "link_flows_to_their_substance"
},
"_transformed": true,
"_provided": {
"name": "Radioactive species, alpha emitters",
"synonyms": [],
"context": [
"Emissions",
"Emissions to water",
"Emissions to fresh water"
],
"cas_numbers": [],
"ec_numbers": [],
"unit": "kBq"
}
}
Something wrong here?
A flow can be wrong in three ways, and they are decided differently. Pick the one that matches what you are looking at.
- A row from my list should not reach this flow
- This flow is not that chemical
- The compartment or the unit is wrong
You do not need to run a build or clone anything. Name the row and say what your evidence is; the measurement is done for you. How contributing works