Scores › ecoinvent 3.12 cutoff
magnesium, for reuse in hafnium sponge production, to generic market for magnesium US
1 kilogram of magnesium; an inventory of 2,771 flows, of which 2,771 reached a consensus flow and 0 did not.
3f149a2c-b1fa-5b7a-b93b-f745d695fa84 · brightway 6b8379e8acccae6a66277e62be7117f2 · ISIC rev.4 ecoinvent: 2420:Manufacture of basic precious and other non-ferrous metals · CPC: 41601: Tungsten, molybdenum, tantalum, magnesium, cobalt, cadmium, titanium, zirconium, beryllium, gallium, hafnium, […]
| Category | Vendor | This list | Ours ÷ theirs | Band | Unmapped share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
acidification
mol H+-Eq
|
0.015889 | 0.015889 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
climate change
kg CO2-Eq
|
5.985753 | 5.987367 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
climate change: biogenic
kg CO2-Eq
|
0.001904 | 0.001904 | 1.000 | identical | 0.00 |
|
climate change: fossil
kg CO2-Eq
|
5.981695 | 5.98331 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
climate change: land use and land use change
kg CO2-Eq
|
0.002153 | 0.002153 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater
CTUe
|
14.112727 | 14.11246 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
CTUe
|
13.6705 | 13.6705 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
CTUe
|
0.442227 | 0.44196 | 0.999 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
energy resources: non-renewable
MJ, net calorific value
|
113.28097 | 113.280777 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: freshwater
kg P-Eq
|
0.00442 | 0.00442 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: marine
kg N-Eq
|
0.003431 | 0.003431 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: terrestrial
mol N-Eq
|
0.027559 | 0.027559 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic
CTUh
|
7.1278e-10 | 7.1278e-10 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
CTUh
|
5.4529e-10 | 5.4529e-10 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
CTUh
|
1.6750e-10 | 1.6750e-10 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
CTUh
|
3.8475e-08 | 3.8475e-08 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
CTUh
|
3.7300e-08 | 3.7300e-08 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
CTUh
|
1.1750e-09 | 1.1750e-09 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ionising radiation: human health
kBq U235-Eq
|
2.333491 | 2.333491 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
land use
dimensionless
|
12.967632 | 12.967632 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
material resources: metals/minerals
kg Sb-Eq
|
1.2229e-05 | 1.2229e-05 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ozone depletion
kg CFC-11-Eq
|
2.6002e-08 | 2.6670e-08 | 1.026 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
particulate matter formation
disease incidence
|
1.0059e-07 | 1.0059e-07 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
kg NMVOC-Eq
|
0.010595 | 0.010595 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
water use
m3 world Eq deprived
|
1.303383 | 0.963928 | 0.740 | 2x | 0.00 |
eutrophication: freshwater: flow by flow
Every flow whose contribution the comparison kept — all that differ, and the agreeing ones above a thousandth of the score — largest gap first. Amounts are per 1 kilogram; where the consensus flow is measured in another unit, × is the conversion the merge recorded and our factor is per that unit.
| Vendor flow | Consensus flow | Amount | × | Their factor | Our factor | Theirs | Ours | Gap | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphate 490b267b-f429-4d9a-ac79-224e37fb4d58 |
Phosphate | 0.011984 | — | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.003955 | 0.003955 | -1.5715e-10 | agree |
| Phosphate 329fc7d8-4011-4327-84e4-34ff76f0e42d |
Phosphate | 0.001401 | — | 0.33 | 0.33 | 4.6242e-04 | 4.6242e-04 | -1.8375e-11 | agree |
| Phosphate 3aaf9017-0d8a-42aa-9a60-cbc39e994e73 |
Phosphate | 5.8706e-07 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | only consensus factor |
| Phosphorus 62f3d964-9b53-4d01-9ee0-04112dcfc6d2 |
Phosphorus | 1.1849e-09 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | only consensus factor |