market for laser machining, metal, with YAG-laser, 200W power GLO
1 hour of laser machining, metal, with YAG-laser, 200W power; an inventory of 2,144 flows, of which 2,144 reached a consensus flow and 0 did not.
a5571972-f1bf-4020-ad45-94afc6b67728 · brightway 36b4fa8024ee05d57d76e95c80b64b74 · EcoSpold01Categories: metals/chipless shaping · ISIC rev.4 ecoinvent: 2592:Treatment and coating of metals; machining · CPC: 88731: Metal treatment and coating services
| Category | Vendor | This list | Ours ÷ theirs | Band | Unmapped share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
acidification
mol H+-Eq
|
0.064967 | 0.064972 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
climate change
kg CO2-Eq
|
9.795493 | 9.587207 | 0.979 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
climate change: biogenic
kg CO2-Eq
|
0.047612 | 0.03781 | 0.794 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
climate change: fossil
kg CO2-Eq
|
9.728282 | 9.529877 | 0.980 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
climate change: land use and land use change
kg CO2-Eq
|
0.019599 | 0.01952 | 0.996 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater
CTUe
|
356.937003 | 54.271102 | 0.152 | 10x | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
CTUe
|
34.784478 | 51.976472 | 1.494 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
CTUe
|
2.262914 | 2.29463 | 1.014 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
energy resources: non-renewable
MJ, net calorific value
|
132.497185 | 132.419488 | 0.999 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: freshwater
kg PO4-Eq
|
0.006116 | 0.006116 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: marine
kg N-Eq
|
0.010324 | 0.010266 | 0.994 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: terrestrial
mol N-Eq
|
0.103845 | 0.103845 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic
CTUh
|
1.8503e-08 | 1.2016e-08 | 0.649 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
CTUh
|
8.4079e-17 | 9.2422e-09 | 109922813.768 | over 100x | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
CTUh
|
2.7737e-09 | 2.7737e-09 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
CTUh
|
3.5424e-07 | 3.3713e-07 | 0.952 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
CTUh
|
1.8533e-08 | 3.2394e-07 | 17.480 | 100x | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
CTUh
|
1.3193e-08 | 1.3189e-08 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ionising radiation: human health
kBq U235-Eq
|
1.72636 | 1.72636 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
land use
dimensionless
|
34.023149 | 34.023149 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
material resources: metals/minerals
kg Sb-Eq
|
4.4140e-04 | 4.4140e-04 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ozone depletion
kg CFC-11-Eq
|
4.9844e-07 | 4.9950e-07 | 1.002 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
particulate matter formation
disease incidence
|
4.7448e-07 | 4.7448e-07 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
photochemical ozone formation: human health
kg NMVOC-Eq
|
0.028958 | 0.028958 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
water use
m3 world eq. deprived
|
6.617519 | 24.330606 | 3.677 | 10x | 0.00 |
eutrophication: freshwater: flow by flow
Every flow whose contribution the comparison kept — all that differ, and the agreeing ones above a thousandth of the score — largest gap first. Amounts are per 1 hour; where the consensus flow is measured in another unit, × is the conversion the merge recorded and our factor is per that unit.
| Vendor flow | Consensus flow | Amount | × | Their factor | Our factor | Theirs | Ours | Gap | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphate 490b267b-f429-4d9a-ac79-224e37fb4d58 |
Phosphate | 0.016698 | — | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.00551 | 0.00551 | -2.1896e-10 | agree |
| Phosphate 329fc7d8-4011-4327-84e4-34ff76f0e42d |
Phosphate | 0.001779 | — | 0.33 | 0.33 | 5.8721e-04 | 5.8721e-04 | -2.3334e-11 | agree |
| Phosphate 1727b41d-377e-43cd-bc01-9eaba946eccb |
Phosphate | 4.1486e-05 | — | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1.3690e-05 | 1.3690e-05 | -5.4400e-13 | agree |
| Phosphate 3aaf9017-0d8a-42aa-9a60-cbc39e994e73 |
Phosphate | 3.1476e-06 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | only consensus factor |
| Phosphorus 62f3d964-9b53-4d01-9ee0-04112dcfc6d2 |
Phosphorus | 1.1488e-09 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | only consensus factor |