market for chromium steel removed by turning, primarily dressing, conventional GLO
1 kilogram of chromium steel removed by turning, primarily dressing, conventional; an inventory of 2,144 flows, of which 2,144 reached a consensus flow and 0 did not.
5d9dbb7a-1a8a-4523-8ff7-f33e3009467d · brightway 5d7c10ec8b53a9161dd25df5f8864983 · EcoSpold01Categories: metals/chipping · ISIC rev.4 ecoinvent: 2592:Treatment and coating of metals; machining · CPC: 39310: Slag, dross, scalings and other waste from the manufacture of iron or steel
| Category | Vendor | This list | Ours ÷ theirs | Band | Unmapped share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
acidification
mol H+-Eq
|
0.038396 | 0.038399 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
climate change
kg CO2-Eq
|
7.342092 | 7.109033 | 0.968 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
climate change: biogenic
kg CO2-Eq
|
0.440265 | 0.349622 | 0.794 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
climate change: fossil
kg CO2-Eq
|
6.895347 | 6.75296 | 0.979 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
climate change: land use and land use change
kg CO2-Eq
|
0.00648 | 0.006451 | 0.996 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater
CTUe
|
479.982289 | 39.373304 | 0.082 | 100x | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
CTUe
|
20.248017 | 37.877874 | 1.871 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
CTUe
|
1.480471 | 1.495429 | 1.010 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
energy resources: non-renewable
MJ, net calorific value
|
75.467723 | 75.452293 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: freshwater
kg PO4-Eq
|
0.002394 | 0.002394 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: marine
kg N-Eq
|
0.008214 | 0.008168 | 0.994 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
eutrophication: terrestrial
mol N-Eq
|
0.076753 | 0.076753 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic
CTUh
|
1.1707e-07 | 3.4100e-08 | 0.291 | 10x | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
CTUh
|
3.4925e-17 | 2.9112e-08 | 833561077.024 | over 100x | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
CTUh
|
4.9877e-09 | 4.9877e-09 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
CTUh
|
1.6711e-07 | 1.4778e-07 | 0.884 | 2x | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
CTUh
|
1.9832e-08 | 1.4471e-07 | 7.296 | 10x | 0.00 |
|
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
CTUh
|
3.0778e-09 | 3.0761e-09 | 0.999 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ionising radiation: human health
kBq U235-Eq
|
0.531539 | 0.531539 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
land use
dimensionless
|
52.987648 | 52.987648 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
material resources: metals/minerals
kg Sb-Eq
|
1.5220e-04 | 1.5220e-04 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
ozone depletion
kg CFC-11-Eq
|
3.7024e-07 | 3.7068e-07 | 1.001 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
particulate matter formation
disease incidence
|
6.5461e-07 | 6.5461e-07 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
photochemical ozone formation: human health
kg NMVOC-Eq
|
0.022347 | 0.022347 | 1.000 | within tolerance | 0.00 |
|
water use
m3 world eq. deprived
|
2.616872 | 4.26851 | 1.631 | 2x | 0.00 |
ionising radiation: human health: flow by flow
Every flow whose contribution the comparison kept — all that differ, and the agreeing ones above a thousandth of the score — largest gap first. Amounts are per 1 kilogram; where the consensus flow is measured in another unit, × is the conversion the merge recorded and our factor is per that unit.
| Vendor flow | Consensus flow | Amount | × | Their factor | Our factor | Theirs | Ours | Gap | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radon-222 4ac6979b-55f2-42ae-8d7e-37846e92506c |
Radon-222 | 259.31787 | — | 0.00114 | 0.00114 | 0.295622 | 0.295622 | 1.3128e-08 | agree |
| Radon-222 1551f1cd-7cb7-4f68-a628-cb9301323c7b |
Radon-222 | 7.269885 | — | 0.00114 | 0.00114 | 0.008288 | 0.008288 | 3.6805e-10 | agree |
| Cesium-137 42901ad7-4be5-47d9-82cd-380ca34281c1 |
Cesium-137 | 8.9949e-05 | — | 7.86 | 7.86 | 7.0700e-04 | 7.0700e-04 | -1.2009e-11 | agree |
| Carbon-14 19256c0f-bea8-4e61-9499-8cc2f84953f8 |
Carbon-14 | 0.02247 | — | 10 | 10 | 0.224701 | 0.224701 | 0 | agree |