Characterisation factors → Global warming, non-fossil → Differences
consensus-flow-list against 2.-0 LCA consultants
Under Global warming, non-fossil, Stepwise 2006. Only the rows where the two state different numbers, widest first. A difference is not an error — competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices.
Both state a number
3
flow and place pairs under this category
The same number
3
100.0% of them, exactly — same
float, full precision
Different numbers
0
they state the same number everywhere they both speak
Only consensus-flow-list
4
stated here and nowhere in the other's list — a difference of flow lists,
not of numbers
Only 2.-0 LCA consultants
0
stated here and nowhere in the other's list — a difference of flow lists,
not of numbers
These two state the same number everywhere they both speak under Global warming, non-fossil. Everything published here is on the category's own page.
This category in the whole-method difference report — every implementation that states a row, banded by the widest pair among them.